A law firm CRM helps the team keep track of inquiries, follow-ups, contacts, and engagement status. It becomes useful when the firm can no longer answer “who is handling this inquiry?” from a reliable shared record. The right system depends on workflow complexity, not simply the number of lawyers.
For Philippine firms, client management should connect inquiry handling to conflict review, scope approval, and matter opening. A sales-style pipeline is incomplete if it encourages staff to collect confidential facts or promise acceptance before a lawyer reviews the matter.
Map the inquiry-to-matter workflow
Use neutral statuses such as “review pending.” Avoid a “client won” label that suggests the engagement is complete before the necessary checks and agreement.
| Stage | Minimum useful record | Decision owner |
|---|---|---|
| Inquiry received | Contact details, source, broad issue, apparent urgency | Intake staff |
| Preliminary screening | Parties, related entities, conflict-review status | Assigned reviewer |
| Consultation | Appointment, authorized notes, next action | Handling lawyer |
| Engagement proposed | Scope, fee basis, approvals | Handling lawyer |
| Accepted | Engagement record and matter owner | Authorized lawyer |
| Closed or declined | Outcome, notice, retention decision | Assigned reviewer |
Spreadsheet, generic CRM, or legal platform?
A generic CRM is not automatically unsuitable, and a legal label does not guarantee an adequate conflict search. Evaluate what staff can demonstrate using realistic fictional data.
| Option | When it can work | What to examine |
|---|---|---|
| Shared spreadsheet | Low volume and a disciplined team | Permissions, change history, reminders, and handover |
| Generic CRM | A defined intake process needing contact and follow-up tools | Confidentiality controls, conflict workflow, matter conversion |
| Legal practice platform | A team that needs intake linked to matters and ongoing work | Actual workflow fit, permissions, export, and implementation effort |
Collect less at the beginning
An initial inquiry may only need names for screening, a contact channel, a broad description, and an indication of urgency. Detailed supporting documents can wait for an appropriate secure process and lawyer instructions.
Write the intake notice in plain language. Explain what the form is for and how the firm will respond. Wording about non-engagement must fit professional duties and actual conduct; a disclaimer cannot be assumed to erase obligations that arise from the interaction.
Choose fields that drive action
Every active inquiry should have an owner, next step, and follow-up date. If the team records a detailed history but nobody owns the next action, the CRM is acting as an archive.
Keep marketing source data separate from confidential matter details. Measure whether an article or referral led to an appropriate inquiry without sending legal facts to analytics tools. Have the privacy lead review form collection and vendor access.
- •Show overdue follow-ups to the responsible person.
- •Prevent unrestricted browsing of sensitive inquiry notes.
- •Record who approved acceptance or decline.
- •Carry verified contact and party data into the matter record.
- •Keep a practical export and departure-access process.
Run a two-week workflow pilot
Use fictional inquiries representing an urgent litigation matter, an existing client’s new instruction, a potential conflict, and a declined matter. Ask staff to complete each path, including handover during absence.
Evaluate missed follow-ups, duplicate data entry, time spent finding status, and exceptions requiring a partner. Adopt the system when the workflow is clearer and accountable, not because a dashboard contains more stages.
Continue reading
Frequently asked questions
What CRM do lawyers use?
Firms use spreadsheets, general CRMs, legal intake products, and practice-management platforms. Choose by demonstrated workflow, access controls, matter handover, and export needs.
Does a CRM replace a conflict check?
No. A system may help search and record information, but a qualified lawyer must evaluate potential conflicts and decide the permitted course.
Try DueCounsel Free
Built for Philippine law firms. Free migration, onboarding, and training.
Start Free